Please make sure to use the only official Bitpie website: https://bitpiepw.com
bitpie
Home Page Announcement Contact Us

English

arrow

Reasons for Multisig Wallet Transaction Failures: In-depth Analysis and Solutions

bitpie
June 12, 2025
Table of contents

With the rapid development of digital currencies, multisig wallets are increasingly becoming an important asset management tool. Their main feature is that multiple signatures are required to execute a transaction, which enhances security to a certain extent. However, transactions with multisig wallets do not always proceed smoothly, and transaction failures occur from time to time. This article will delve into the various reasons for multisig wallet transaction failures and explore ways to address these issues, so that users can better manage their digital assets.

  • Overview of Multi-signature Wallets
  • A multi-signature wallet refers to a type of digital wallet that is essentially a smart contract with multiple signatures. In such a wallet, users can set up multiple public keys and specify the number of signatures required for each transaction. This approach is mainly used to enhance security and prevent asset loss caused by the leakage of a single user's private key.

    1.1 Advantages of Multi-signature Wallets

  • Enhance securityBecause multiple signatures are required, it is difficult for an attacker to gain control of all assets by stealing a single private key.
  • Collective decision-makingIn a team or organization, a multi-signature wallet allows all members to participate in decision-making, increasing transparency and accountability.
  • Reduce the risk of human errorRequiring more than one signature ensures that the transaction is verified multiple times, thereby reducing the likelihood of errors.
  • 1.2 Disadvantages of Multi-signature Wallets

    Reasons for Multisig Wallet Transaction Failures: In-depth Analysis and Solutions

    Despite its many advantages, multisignature wallets are not entirely foolproof. Their complex operational processes may lead to user errors during use. A detailed analysis of this issue will be provided below.

  • II. Common Causes of Multisig Wallet Transaction Failures
  • 2.1 User Operation Error

    The operation of multi-signature wallets is usually more complex than that of traditional wallets, and users may make mistakes due to unfamiliarity when setting up and executing transactions.

  • Missing required signatureWhen initiating a transaction, if the required number of signatures is not obtained, the transaction cannot be successfully executed. This situation often occurs because some authorized members are unable to respond in time or fail to sign promptly.
  • Improper private key managementIf a user participating in the signature loses their private key, the transaction cannot proceed. Although the overall security is enhanced, the user's dependency also increases.
  • 2.2 Technical Issues

    Technical malfunctions are often another major cause of multisig wallet transaction failures.

  • Network latencyIn a blockchain network, transactions need to be validated. If the network becomes congested, transactions may remain in a pending state for a long time and ultimately fail due to timeout.
  • Software compatibilityDifferent wallet software or applications may have compatibility issues, resulting in some functions not working properly and thus affecting the smooth execution of transactions.
  • 2.3 Contract Vulnerabilities

    Poor contract design can directly lead to multisig wallet failure.

  • Smart contract vulnerabilitiesIf there are logical errors in the smart contract behind a multi-signature wallet, it may result in transaction failures. For example, improper condition settings may cause valid signatures to go unrecognized.
  • Improper permission settingsWhen creating a multi-signature wallet, if permission management is inadequate, certain necessary operations may be accidentally disabled, thereby affecting the execution of transactions.
  • 2.4 Insufficient Funds

    Blockchain transactions usually require the payment of a miner fee (Gas Fee) in order to be executed successfully.

  • Insufficient miner feeIf the user fails to pay the appropriate miner fee when initiating a transaction, it may result in the transaction being rejected by the network and thus unable to be executed successfully.
  • market volatilityDuring periods of high market volatility, miner fees may fluctuate significantly, causing transactions that were originally sufficiently budgeted to face insufficient fees at the time of actual submission.
  • 2.5 Third-Party Errors

    Multisignature wallets that rely on third-party services may also be affected during transactions.

  • API failureMany multi-signature wallets rely on external APIs to perform certain operations. If the API fails, transactions may be at risk of failure.
  • Lack of effective technical supportIf users are unable to obtain timely technical support and solutions when encountering problems, it may also result in the failure to complete transactions.
  • Solutions for Transaction Failure
  • In response to the reasons for the transaction failures mentioned above, this paper proposes several corresponding solutions to help users manage multisignature wallets more effectively.

    3.1 Strengthen User Training

    It is very important to ensure that all users participating in multi-signature transactions have a clear understanding of the operation process.

  • Regular trainingConduct regular training sessions for team members to familiarize them with the usage process of multi-signature wallets, including how to correctly initiate transactions and obtain signatures.
  • Create help documentationCreate a detailed user manual or operation guide to provide users with clear instructions to follow during the operation process.
  • 3.2 Enhancing Technical Stability

    Ensure the stable operation of the technical system behind the multi-signature wallet to reduce transaction failures caused by technical malfunctions.

  • Choose a high-quality wallet service providerUse a multi-signature wallet service with high popularity and good user reviews.
  • Regularly check for software updates.Regularly check and update your wallet software to ensure compatibility and security.
  • 3.3 Improve Smart Contracts

    When creating a multi-signature wallet, ensure that the contract is thoroughly audited to prevent vulnerabilities.

  • Code auditConduct a comprehensive audit of the smart contract by a third-party organization to ensure its logic is correct and free of vulnerabilities.
  • Continuous optimizationDuring operation, continuously optimize contract design based on user feedback.
  • 3.4 Managing Miner Fees

    Users should ensure sufficient miner fees when using a multi-signature wallet to avoid transaction failures due to insufficient fees.

  • Real-time expense monitoringUse tools or services to monitor current miner fees in real time to ensure reasonable fees are set when making transactions.
  • Set up an automatic adjustment mechanismDevelop an automated mechanism to monitor and adjust fees, ensuring that transactions can proceed smoothly under appropriate network conditions.
  • 3.5 Strengthening Third-Party Selection

    When a multi-signature wallet relies on third-party services, make sure to choose reliable partners.

  • Review service providerCarefully review the reputation and track record of third-party service providers to ensure the stability of their technical services.
  • Develop alternative optionsEstablish alternative options for critical third-party services to enable rapid switching in the event of a failure.
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • 4.1 How secure is a multi-signature wallet?

    Multi-signature wallets enhance transaction security through multiple signatures, reducing the risk of a single private key being compromised. However, users still need to maintain good management of their private keys and mnemonic phrases, and regularly check the security of smart contracts.

    4.2 Why do my multisig transactions always fail?

    Transaction failures are usually caused by user errors, technical issues, contract vulnerabilities, insufficient fees, or malfunctions of third-party services. Ensuring proper procedures, strengthening technical stability, and conducting contract audits can all effectively reduce the risk of failure.

    4.3 Is a multi-signature wallet suitable for personal use?

    Although multisig wallets are generally more advantageous for teams or organizations, individual users can also use them. When there are higher requirements for asset security, multisig wallets can effectively provide additional protection.

    4.4 How to choose a good multi-signature wallet?

    Choose wallet services with high credibility and reputation, ensuring they have strong technical support and positive user reviews. In addition, check whether their smart contracts have been audited and pay attention to whether comprehensive user support is provided.

    4.5 What should be done if the private key is lost?

    The characteristic of a multi-signature wallet is that multiple private keys are required to complete a transaction. If a signer's private key is lost, transactions can still be executed using the remaining valid private keys, but the level of security will be reduced. Therefore, it is recommended that users regularly back up their private keys and mnemonic phrases as a precaution.

    4.6 What are the fee standards for multi-signature wallets?

    The main cost of a multi-signature wallet is the miner fee incurred during transactions, and the specific amount will vary depending on network congestion. Users should check the current miner fee before initiating a transaction to ensure that the transaction can be executed smoothly.

    Through the in-depth analysis above, users can better understand the reasons for multisig wallet transaction failures and their solutions, helping to avoid difficulties in digital currency management. It is hoped that this article will assist you in using multisig wallets, making your asset management safer and smoother.

    Previous:
    Next: